Cile armady pro nasledujici desetileti (scifi vyblitek)

 Myslim, ze po upgradu by OT-64 Skot pro potreby dnesniho bojiste (a ze by nemusel byt ten upgrade az tak velky) - tak naprosto dostacujici a plne vyhovujici obrneny transporter. Ale ne, my misto abychom vyuzili kapacity a znalosti ceskeho zbrojarskeho prumyslu - radeji nakupujeme v zahranici... A ona ta kvalita tam ma taky svoje limity. A radeji mala domu nez sponzorovat za kazdou cenu okolni staty ci ty vzdalenejsi. Ocekavam, ze po ukrajinskych zkusenostech se objevi Skot 2 ci rovnou Buvol. A nase nove rizene roje dronu - vzdyt to se od nas snazi kopirovat na obou stranach zemekoule. Pokud k jejich rizeni a zpracovani informaci pouzijeme ty eftripetky s jejich umelou inteligenci - a pridame male pasove roboty - tak do valky s Ruskem vubec nemusime! Posleme roboticke jednotky. Ktere nejen ze pouzivaji AI, ale muzou byt na dalku rizene clovekem. A hracu pocitacovych her je v Cesku vpysk! Prvni europeanska roboticka armada. Pasovy prepravnik s tezkym kulometem, schopny vypalit i salvu protitankovych raket. Takove "Cislo 5 zije!" v ceskem podani... Vzdyt na letistich pouzivaji remote control pri odmrazovani. Jak tezke muze byt zabezpecit a ochranit radiovy prenos k ovladani takovych vozidel?

Predstavte si ty moznosti u takovehoto transporteru - zadate jizdu v kolone a potrebujete jen jednoho ridice. Ktery jeste navic sedi uplne jinde. Odveze 10 vozidel pechoty na misto urceni. Zada automaticky navrat po stejne trase zpet. A jede odvezt jinou kolonu... S zivym nakladem s pilotem, prazdny na autosofera :) eftripetky prinaseji neskutecne moznosti! Jsou to letajici pevnosti s az nehoraznymi elektrobojovymi schopnostmi. Do toho spada i monitoring bojiste ;) Ale taky jsou pekelne drahe a stejnou sluzbu by nam udelaly SAABy generace 4 a pul. Akorat bychom nemohli shazovat jaderne pumy... Ale nabidka kterou jsme dostali od SAABu se neodmita. A amikum jsme se ani neodvazili navrhnout jakekoliv zmeny ve smlouve. Naprosto pro nas nevyhodna, nabalujici spoustu neviditelnych miliard navic. Amik vi, amik umi. SAAB by nam dodal o pul hlavy mensi letoun s veskerym servisem, levnejsim provozem, s moznosti startu z dalnice... Ale ne, my potrebujeme raketoplan, co bude moct vzletat a pristavat jen na jednom letisti. A do toho tolik tajnustkareni, ze jsme vlastne koupili tajemny hrad v Karpatech. Protoze aplikace jsou nedodelane. Update nejisty. A hlavne kdo to zaplati kdyz nebude neco fungovat jak ma? Nebo jak jsme si predstavovali ze to bude fungovat? A navic nemoznost vyvinout vlastni aplikace ci pripojit vlastni senzory. Jen ty schvalene... Zadna moznost API. Tim si nas amik zavazal abychom museli odebirat spolupracujici navazne produkty a nemohli jednoduse zmenit dodavatele. Nebo nedejboze si vybrat z vicera dodavatelu. A to si budte jisti, ze schvalenych dodavatelu je jen hrstka. Vetsina z USA, par z Izraele. Takze vendor locked jizda!!! gut dzob check govrnmentalove. Deti mych vnoucat vas budou proklinat za tenhle krok!
Jen takovej malej scifi vyblitek. Shoda se skutecnosti je ciste nahodna a zcela se vymyka normalnimu chapani. Ten Rus byl alespon co se tyce zbrani na urovni. Chtel jen uhli. Donald The Duck chce lithium, zlato, platinu, uran a uhlim taky nepohrdne. To alespon proda Polakum :D
Za cenu tech eftripetek bychom stejny pocet SAABu a servis na 15 let...
Mentalove vladni, nejsou blbci zadni. Lehce penez nabyli, jen pro to, aby je co nejrychleji utratili. A za to nakonec hlavu ztratili nebo rovnou viseli. Na zdi. Vyfoceni. Zastreleni to snad ne, kdyz zbran ani vojak dnes nedostane. To se prece deje jen na Ukrajine. Daleko na vychode. Kde Smigovec a Strihovec je. A pak konecne mesto! Uzgorod. Ceskoslovenska nejvychodnejsi basta. Kde kozaci a slovaci davaji dobrou noc. Vlkum. A ne tem nocnim. Protoze nejen ti, overuji nasi ostrazitost a pripravenost. Zautocili ve chvili kdy si mysleli, ze jsme dostatecne slabi, abychom cokoliv udelali. My jsme v tehle chvili jen bezzubi. Dokud se nerozjede vojenska vyroba naplno v Tatre a Skode, dokud CZ bude jen paberkovat na soukrome klientele - nemame sanci. Rus poukazuje na to, jak nebezpecne meni EU retoriku a zacina zbrojit. Sam pritom jede na plny vykon. Jebat Spartu! Teda Spartak! AAH! Vlastne Dynamo... Hura na Vladivostok! musi kricet spolecne deti, cerstve plnoleti, muzi i zeny v produktivnim veku a duchodci jakbyssmet... Jinak Rus nebude mit zadnou hruzu z nas a bude dale zerty vymyslet, jak nas zamestnat. A rozklizit. Cim dele budeme rozhodovat co bude nasledovat - tim nechavame volny prostor demagogii a negativnimu ovlivnovani verejneho mineni. Doufam, ze kontrasi vsech slozek posilili sve rady a lepe hlidaji pohyby figurek po sachovnici. Soucasne moznosti z Izraele umoznuji 100% kontrolu napadenych zarizeni i vypnutych. Pouzivaji doufam jizz vsech metod ke stopovani nepritele a zabraneni niceni zive i nezive sily, tak jako nedavno Cepitkin s Olihnidem. Je treba si naklonit pres 75% nasich k nastartovani jine mentality. Z dementality zpatky do reality.
It is better to be a warrior in the garden, than gardener in the war. Je lepe byti valecnikem v zahrade, nez zahradnikem ve valce. Brukli byl mistr.
Ale co na to Metar? Ten by si ubalil a sledoval jak cas spleta sve nitky do poradneho provazu. Ochotnych. Ne ochotniku. Branit svou vlast. Tak musel jsem prisahat. A slibit zivot obetovat. Tak davaj nejakou pannu. Obet na oltar casu. Hura na Vladivostok! Tak jako nasi pradedove po transsibirske magistrale. Cervenym i bilym na zlost. Proto se vrhli na nas jako na kost v letech padesatych. Ohlodat co nechal Nemec. Ted je cas vrhnout se na ne, ale ne divoce. Pomalu je zacit rozkladat stejne, jako oni to delaji nam. Zakerne a bez pravidel. Jediny cil - zpusobit co nejvetsi skodu bez ohledu na ztraty na zivotech. Jaky maji asi zeleznice zabezpeceni? Pouzivaji k vyhlaseni leteckeho poplachu obecni rozhlas? A maji to dalkove ovladane? Rozeznit letecky poplach po celem Rusku ohlasujici jaderny uder. Jen tak, ze srandy. Vypnout elektrinu ve vetsine elektraren po celem Rusku. Nastavit vyrobni linky tak, aby zpusobovaly na prvni i druhy pohled zadne skody. Ale po par tisicich kilometrech totalne znici motor. Posilat civilni drony jen tak krouzit nad Kremlem. Az jeden havaruje...
Uvaha nad timto nelehkym tematem se vymkla kontrole. Zadam o shvovivavost a mirny trest. Treba byti osamocenym vlkem, kdyz nepritel se prochazi v ulicich. A po jednom je srovnavat pod zemi. Ale tak daleko to snad nedojde. Ocekavam jen drony a klouzave bomby, mozna nejaky ten Oresnik do NHcka a do Vitkovic, na Trebovickou elektrarnu a vic tu neni nic. Z Bratislavy ale bliz je Brno. Ze Ziliny by vsak mohli taky utocit. Divejme se na svet tak jak je a neverme, ze sousede budou navzdy pratele... Budme pripraveni navratit se zpet, do tricatych let. A nejlepe kdyz historie se opakuje. Vyvarujme se chyb predeslych - stanovme pro armadu jasny plan, jak se zachovat, az nepritel bude pred branami stat. Aby nejaky politik nemohl za generala rozkaz vykonat. Nasrat! meli tehda vsichni muzi rvat a jit bojovat... Ne se jen odevzdane smat. I kdyby jsme tehda prohrali, nasi hrdost bychom si zachovali. A nemuseli se pak dalsich 40 let ponizovat a hrbet ohybat. Armada musi rychle cestu vymyslet jak nabobtnat. Bez zbytecnych nakladu. Vojaky pri cviceni jednoduse v zeleny mundur oblekat. Bez maskace a dalsich uprav. Alespon se nauci poradne prirodou maskovat. Vozidla domaci provenience preferovat. A dalsi hromadu napadu z plena upravovat a vylepsovat. Proc takovato vozidla ktera skvela byla, osvedcila se do dnesnich dnu, kompletne predelavat? Staci par inzenyru jeden kus osahat, koupit po kuse z ruznych koutu sveta, zjistit plusy a minusy, pak armada musi vyrobu experimentalniho kusu zadat. Sloucit zbrojovky a vojenske vyrobce do konsorcia. Soutez o zakazku vypsat. Letoun pate generace asi tezko dokazeme za 5 let, ale transportery, tanky, drony... Verejna soutez by dokazala prekvapit. Nekdy bezny zlaty cesky rucicky vyrobi 7mou generaci ani o tom nevi. A verejne pripraveny projekt potom na konsorciu vysoutezit. Kolik tezkych kulometu zvladnou ve Witkovitz vyrobit? A kolik minometu zvladne takovy Palestinec za hodinu s minimem nakladu a zdroju? Kdyz kazdy check zacne myslet jako osamoceny vlk, tak ani armada kolaborantu nema sanci. K tomu je treba nove rekruty vest. A zacinat uz ve skolce. Vzdyt kdo si nechtel na vojaky jako kluk hrat? A assymetric fight means do valky proti tankum tyto kluky posilat. Protoze nevinnost vyhrava nad neduverivosti. Snizenim hranice trestni odpovednosti se musi brzo dostavit. A od 16ti pokud nestuduje tak je do armady hnat. A poradne lidi z nich udelat. Bez sikany. Se starostlivosti otce ci bratra. Shovivavost projevit. Ale pevnou ruku mit. Ukazat, ze armada je opravdu sve duvery hodna. Nenechat se k pletichareni svest a politikareni politikum prenechat. Za svym tvrde stat. Potrebujeme 30000 vojaku do 5 ti let? Potom o 90000 je treba zadat. Aby naplnil se nutny stav. Klidne zakulhat, ze tloustiku mate plno do svych rad. Vzdyt Svejk taky nebyl zadny atlet. A nemate proc jen sportovce zadat. Snizit naroky. Zvysit stav. Postupne ochablou populaci vycvicit. Dril dokaze z kluka za par tydnu chlapa udelat. Pechota je ale jen jeden znak. My celou abecedu potrebujeme znat. Snizit naroky na vzdelani - spousta maturit umi tolik co bakalar, akorat maji trochu zivelnejsi pristup a dokumentaci oni neradi. Ovsem pokud takovy filozof bude dokumentovat, co normalni clovek delat ma - dopadne to jako v sajuzu. Je treba na jednoho inzenyra 20 s maturitou. Ti rychle inzenyrske zpusoby preberou a praxi okoreni co inzenyr v hlave ma. Papir snese vsechno. Ovsem experimentalni prototyp - to uz je pokrocily vyvoj. Tam je treba investovat a objednavky zadavat. A hlavne doma hledat. Nekoukat jen co jini prodavaji. Lead musi byt ten co sklidi ovoce spolecne s celym tymem. Jestli jen Commandos chcete mit - soucasny vycvik staci zachovat. Ovsem pokud chcete funkcni armadu - je treba firmy i jednotlivce zapojit. Dobrovolne je nechat prispet svymi zivoty. 5 tydnu zakladni vycvik a pak 14dnu co 2 roky znalosti oprasit. Dobrovolniky klidne 5x rocne nechat cvicit kdyz budou chtit. Jeden zkuseny velitel a k nemu 4 profi-vojaky + 2 bojem ostrilene Ukrajince jako poradce. Znovu nechat kluky ridicaky na "vsechno" si udelat behem vycviku. Vzdyt armada potrebuje v dobe valky vice lidi v tylu a zasobovani nez na fronte. A nebude mit kde brat. Firmy musi fungovat. Kdyz kluci budou techniku znat, muzou machrovat. Armada musi lidem nabidnout benefity, kdyz neni schopna vyvazit soukromy sektor financne. Poradnou kuchyni brancum dat. Se zapojenim firem je to jeste jednodussi. Team building s armadou - osahat si bez nutnosti zavazku tu cest. Slouzit. Postupne prestiz ziskat. A pomahat firmam lidi vybirat. Nekdy i techniku zapujcit. Vice se prezentovat a ukazovat. Ziskat na svou stranu verejne mineni - to prave ted ta nejosidnejsi vec na ni. Beze strachu rici pravdu - to pro vojaka sovetskeho nejtezsi ukol. Pro vojaka ceskeho musi byt pravda tak snadna jako se vycurat nebo dychat. Nesnazit se brance v prvnich tydnech zlikvidovat, ale nechat je primknout blize a chtit vice. Ajtak nebude po tydnu behat sprint 3 kilometry do kopce a zpet, davat 20 kliku s batohem a strilet jako buh. Ale postupne se muze dostat tam, kde chceme ho mit. A nekteri zvlastni znalosti maji - jen armada takove lidi nechce pro zhorseny zdravotni stav. Vzdyt dnes uz nemusime pochodovat 200kilometru od vlaku na bojiste. Staci kratky pochod 25km a beh na 500m zvladne kazdy snob. Boj ve meste nevyzaduje ani schopnosti pohybovat se v lese. Ale musi se predatorem stat. Znat svuj prostor, sve bojiste. Nechte vojaky doma trenovat - tam ziskaji duveru a budou snaze se pozdeji presouvat. Civilni povolani muze byt zavadejici. Praxe a zkusenosti je treba preferovat. Orientacni beh je sice super vec, kdyz ale 90% casu ve meste travi clovek, pak v lese muze pripadat jak hroch. Nejprve ve znamem prostredi je nechte se pohybovat. Do volne prirody je vypustte pak. Nemehla a slabousi budou nejprve. Je treba zavrit obe oci a pro vetsinu skolu zivota predstavovat. Nasi tatove zazili sovetske vedeni a cviceni. Dneska se jim to vraci a podvedome citi tlak a propaganda, ktera se jim vryla pod kuzi vyplouva na povrch. Nenapadna psychologicka finta - kdyz neustale cvicili a zminovali nepritele, tak automaticky i pritele. Toho nejvetsiho v nasich dejinach. Ktery opet si na nas klade narok a zpet chce sve kanady dat. Rusko. Rudy bratr. Socialisticky svaz republik, ktery vetsinu statu chce znovu ovladat. A tak Americe konkurovat. Radeji odstranme vsechny regulace - par jedincu to mozna bude zivot stat. Ale zit se bude jinak. Cesko musi jit prikladem - tretina zakonu staci k zivotu. Zbytek jen prostor pro manipulace poskytuje. Zacneme k lidem pristupovat jako k myslicim bytostem. Predpokladejme ze jsou silni, schopni a maji pud sebezachovy. Pokud jedinec ktery toto nesplnuje, k ujme prijde. Je to jen jeho vec. Nemuzeme chranit a branit pitomce. Kam by ta civilizace dospela? Vybirejme prirodnim vyberem - i slabsi si prekvapive rychle najde svou cestu. Dejme lidem prirozeny prostor, nezasahujme do kazde oblasti zivota s potrebou vsechno a vsechny ridit. Budeme se nam lepe dychat i lepe zit. A armada toho musi docilit. Politici nemaji ten cit, a vlastne ani snahu toto vse resit...

.exe executable reverse-engineering (Python)

 

Problem:

How can I extract files from an executable created by PyInstaller?

Solution:

1. Clone the pyinstxtractor-ng repository:

   git clone https://github.com/pyinstxtractor/pyinstxtractor-ng.git
   

2. Extract the executable:

   cd pyinstxtractor-ng
   python pyinstxtractor-ng.py "<path_to_/dist/app>"
   

3. Install dependencies:

   sudo yum install cmake make clang
   

4. Clone the pycdc repository:

   git clone https://github.com/zrax/pycdc.git
   

5. Build and compile:

   cd pycdc
   cmake CMakeLists.txt
   make
   

6. Decompile the bytecode:

   ./pycdc "<path_to_/app_extracted/app.pyc>"
   

By following these steps, you can extract and decompile files from a PyInstaller-generated executable.

The usage of pycdc will fail if you used a newer version of Python to compile.
If they were compiled by a newer Python version (i.e.3.9-3.12)
-- use PyLingual.io service!  <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

pylingual.io

Tech2Win + GDS2 multi-language

Tech2Win Multi-Language (CZ,PL,RO,EN,DE,NO,TR and others...) 

- install Tech2Win, copy the bin and conf files to a location 

- run Tech2Win , choose the bin file with language

GDS2 multi-language

- including keygen 

 

https://file.io/gDqMwu4PnIrN

LINK:   https://file.io/gDqMwu4PnIrN

https://file.io/gDqMwu4PnIrN

https://file.io/gDqMwu4PnIrN

Coup in Russian military and International support

 

While it’s true that many Western countries are in opposition to Russia's actions, particularly in the context of the conflict in Ukraine, the idea that a coup within the Russian military would automatically receive international support is more complex and nuanced.

1. Uncertainty and Stability Concerns

• Unpredictability: A coup in a nuclear-armed country like Russia would introduce a high degree of unpredictability. Western governments might be concerned about the potential for instability, especially regarding the control and security of nuclear weapons.
• Risk of Civil War: A coup could lead to internal conflict or civil war, which would create significant humanitarian and security challenges, both within Russia and potentially spilling over into neighboring regions.

2. Potential for Escalation

• Escalation of Conflict: If a coup leads to a power struggle, there could be an escalation in military actions, either internally within Russia or externally if factions seek to assert control or retaliate against perceived threats. This could exacerbate tensions between Russia and Western countries.
• Nuclear Security: The international community, including the West, would be deeply concerned about the security of Russia’s nuclear arsenal. A coup could compromise the command and control of these weapons, raising the risk of a nuclear crisis.

3. Support Dependent on Outcomes

• Nature of the Coup: Western reactions would likely depend on who leads the coup and what their intentions are. If the coup is led by a faction that promises to de-escalate international tensions, respect human rights, and potentially move toward more democratic governance, there could be cautious support. However, if the coup is led by hardliners or those with more aggressive policies, the West might be more reluctant to offer support.
• Humanitarian Concerns: Western governments would also consider the humanitarian impact of a coup. If it leads to widespread violence or repression, support could be tempered by concerns about human rights abuses.

4. Diplomatic and Strategic Considerations

• Diplomatic Response: Western nations might initially take a cautious approach, seeking to understand the situation before committing to any form of support. Diplomatic channels would likely be used to communicate with the new leadership or any opposition groups to assess the situation.
• Strategic Interests: The West’s response would also be shaped by strategic interests. If a coup presented an opportunity to reduce hostilities and open new avenues for negotiation or cooperation, there might be support. Conversely, if it worsens the geopolitical situation, the response could be more guarded.

5. Legal and Ethical Concerns

• Legitimacy of Power Change: Supporting a coup can be problematic in terms of international law and the principles of national sovereignty. Western countries generally prefer to promote democratic processes and might be hesitant to openly support an unconstitutional change in power.
• Precedent: Supporting a coup could set a precedent that might be used against Western interests in the future, so any such support would likely be carefully considered.

Conclusion

While Western countries might view the removal of the current Russian leadership as potentially beneficial to their interests, the situation is highly complex. The West's response to a coup in Russia would be driven by concerns about stability, security (especially regarding nuclear weapons), humanitarian impacts, and the nature of the new leadership. Thus, any international reaction would likely be cautious, measured, and contingent on the specifics of the situation.

PROFINET hacking

 It is theoretically possible to connect to a PROFINET network and perform malicious actions if certain vulnerabilities are present. PROFINET is an industrial Ethernet standard used primarily for automation in industrial environments, and like any networked system, it can be susceptible to attacks if not properly secured. Here’s how such a scenario could unfold:

Potential Attack Vectors

1. Unauthorized Access: If an attacker gains unauthorized access to the PROFINET network, either physically or through a compromised network device, they could potentially interact with and control devices on that network. This could involve sending malicious commands, altering device configurations, or interrupting communications between devices.

2. Exploiting Vulnerabilities: Like many network protocols, PROFINET can have vulnerabilities, particularly if the devices or the network itself are not up-to-date with security patches. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to disrupt operations, modify process data, or cause physical damage to equipment.

3. Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: An attacker could intercept and alter communications between devices on a PROFINET network. This could involve manipulating data being sent to and from controllers and field devices, leading to incorrect operation of industrial processes.

4. Denial of Service (DoS) Attacks: By flooding the network with excessive traffic or sending malformed packets, an attacker could disrupt the normal operation of the PROFINET network, leading to downtime or unsafe conditions in the industrial process.

5. Replay Attacks: If an attacker captures legitimate PROFINET traffic, they might be able to replay it later to cause devices to act inappropriately, potentially leading to harmful operations or disruption of service.

Mitigating the Risks

To protect against these types of attacks, several security measures should be implemented:

1. Network Segmentation: Segmenting the PROFINET network from other networks (especially external networks) using firewalls or virtual LANs (VLANs) can limit the attack surface.

2. Access Controls: Implementing strong access control measures, such as network admission control (NAC), strong passwords, and user authentication, can prevent unauthorized access to the network.

3. Encryption: Where possible, use encryption for communications over the network to protect data from being intercepted or altered.

4. Regular Updates and Patching: Keeping all devices and software up-to-date with the latest security patches reduces the risk of known vulnerabilities being exploited.

5. Monitoring and Intrusion Detection: Continuous monitoring of network traffic and the use of intrusion detection systems (IDS) can help identify and respond to suspicious activities quickly.

6. Device Hardening: Ensuring that all devices on the PROFINET network are configured securely, with unnecessary services disabled, and default passwords changed, reduces the chances of exploitation.

Conclusion

While it is possible for malicious actions to be performed on a PROFINET network, this risk can be significantly reduced with proper security measures. Industrial control systems, including those using PROFINET, should be protected with the same rigor as traditional IT systems, considering their critical role in industrial operations. Security by design, regular auditing, and proactive monitoring are essential to safeguarding these networks against malicious actions.

BGP hijacking

 

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) can be hijacked, and unfortunately, it has been hijacked in the past, leading to significant security incidents. BGP hijacking occurs when a malicious entity or even a misconfigured network advertises incorrect routing information to redirect internet traffic. This can result in traffic being intercepted, monitored, or rerouted through unintended paths, potentially leading to a range of harmful outcomes.

How BGP Hijacking Happens

BGP is a critical protocol used to exchange routing information between autonomous systems (AS) on the internet. Since BGP is based on trust between networks, it does not inherently verify the authenticity of the route advertisements it receives. This trust-based model can be exploited in several ways:

1. Prefix Hijacking: An attacker advertises ownership of an IP address block (prefix) that they do not actually own. Other networks may accept these routes and direct traffic to the attacker's network instead of the legitimate destination.

2. Man-in-the-Middle (MitM): The attacker advertises a route that causes traffic to pass through their network, allowing them to intercept and potentially alter the data before passing it along to the intended destination.

3. Route Leaks: A network mistakenly (or maliciously) advertises routes learned from one network to another network, violating expected routing policies. This can cause traffic to take inefficient or insecure paths.

Consequences of BGP Hijacking

The impacts of BGP hijacking can be severe, including:

• Traffic Interception: Sensitive data can be intercepted and monitored by malicious actors.
• Service Disruption: Traffic can be rerouted to the wrong destination, leading to service outages or significant delays.
• Malware Distribution: Hijacked traffic can be redirected to malicious websites or servers.
• Loss of Confidentiality: Unencrypted data can be exposed to attackers.

Mitigations and Best Practices

Given the potential severity of BGP hijacking, there are several best practices and technologies designed to mitigate this risk:

1. Route Filtering: Network operators should carefully filter incoming BGP routes to accept only legitimate prefixes from their peers.

2. Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI): RPKI is a cryptographic method to secure BGP by associating a route advertisement with a verified, authentic source.

3. Monitoring and Alerts: Regular monitoring of BGP routes can help detect abnormal routing behavior that might indicate a hijack.

4. Mutual Authentication: Use of mutual authentication between BGP peers to ensure that route advertisements are coming from trusted sources.

Anarchists and anarchism in Czech

 In support of their goals of eliminating capitalism and the current form of the US Government, anarchist violent extremists oppose economic globalization; political, economic, and social hierarchies based on class, religion, race, gender, or private ownership of capital; and external forms of authority represented by centralized government, the military, and law enforcement. Anarchist violent extremists believe the abolition of capitalism and the state would restore equality and encourage the need for mutual cooperation.

Anarchists in Czech 

pre-Anarchists = Kalisnici (Husite)

19th and 20th century = Viktor Dyk, S.K. Neumann, Frana Sramek, Petr Bezruc, Jaroslav Hasek...